↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.018
Authors

Greg Brown, Jonathan Rhodes, Marie Dade

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 30%
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 6 12%
Unspecified 5 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 30%
Unspecified 13 26%
Social Sciences 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,423,408
of 12,300,422 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#186
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,645
of 263,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,300,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.