You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape & Urban Planning, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.018 |
| Authors |
Greg Brown, Jonathan Rhodes, Marie Dade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 46% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 18% |
| Unknown | 77 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 48 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 15 | 6% |
| Engineering | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 102 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,720,485
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#659
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,940
of 357,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#19
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.