↓ Skip to main content

Social participation and healthy ageing: a neglected, significant protective factor for chronic non communicable conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social participation and healthy ageing: a neglected, significant protective factor for chronic non communicable conditions
Published in
Globalization and Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-7-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy R Holmes, Jennifer Joseph

Abstract

Low and middle income countries are ageing at a much faster rate than richer countries, especially in Asia. This is happening at a time of globalisation, migration, urbanisation, and smaller families. Older people make significant contributions to their families and communities, but this is often undermined by chronic disease and preventable disability. Social participation can help to protect against morbidity and mortality. We argue that social participation deserves much greater attention as a protective factor, and that older people can play a useful role in the prevention and management of chronic conditions. We present, as an example, a low-cost, sustainable strategy that has increased social participation among elders in Sri Lanka.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 231 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 25%
Social Sciences 46 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 13 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 58 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,778,730
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#871
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,809
of 152,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.