You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring and mapping the global burden of antimicrobial resistance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-018-1073-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon I. Hay, Puja C. Rao, Christiane Dolecek, Nicholas P. J. Day, Andy Stergachis, Alan D. Lopez, Christopher J. L. Murray |
| Abstract |
The increasing number and global distribution of pathogens resistant to antimicrobial drugs is potentially one of the greatest threats to global health, leading to health crises arising from infections that were once easy to treat. Infections resistant to antimicrobial treatment frequently result in longer hospital stays, higher medical costs, and increased mortality. Despite the long-standing recognition of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) across many settings, there is surprisingly poor information about its geographical distribution over time and trends in its population prevalence and incidence. This makes reliable assessments of the health burden attributable to AMR difficult, weakening the evidence base to drive forward research and policy agendas to combat AMR. The inclusion of mortality and morbidity data related to drug-resistant infections into the annual Global Burden of Disease Study should help fill this policy void. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 24% |
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 76% |
| Scientists | 8 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 488 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 72 | 15% |
| Researcher | 60 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 80 | 16% |
| Unknown | 161 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 97 | 20% |
| Unknown | 184 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#734,139
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#520
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,126
of 342,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#17
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.