↓ Skip to main content

The oral and gut microbiomes are perturbed in rheumatoid arthritis and partly normalized after treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
221 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
20 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1111 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The oral and gut microbiomes are perturbed in rheumatoid arthritis and partly normalized after treatment
Published in
Nature Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1038/nm.3914
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuan Zhang, Dongya Zhang, Huijue Jia, Qiang Feng, Donghui Wang, Di Liang, Xiangni Wu, Junhua Li, Longqing Tang, Yin Li, Zhou Lan, Bing Chen, Yanli Li, Huanzi Zhong, Hailiang Xie, Zhuye Jie, Weineng Chen, Shanmei Tang, Xiaoqiang Xu, Xiaokai Wang, Xianghang Cai, Sheng Liu, Yan Xia, Jiyang Li, Xingye Qiao, Jumana Yousuf Al-Aama, Hua Chen, Li Wang, Qing-jun Wu, Fengchun Zhang, Wenjie Zheng, Yongzhe Li, Mingrong Zhang, Guangwen Luo, Wenbin Xue, Liang Xiao, Jun Li, Wanting Chen, Xun Xu, Ye Yin, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, Karsten Kristiansen, Liang Liu, Ting Li, Qingchun Huang, Yingrui Li, Jun Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 221 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1079 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 206 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 196 18%
Student > Master 138 12%
Student > Bachelor 106 10%
Other 57 5%
Other 179 16%
Unknown 229 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 225 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 200 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 154 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 121 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 2%
Other 114 10%
Unknown 270 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#150,129
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#667
of 9,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,461
of 275,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#4
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.