↓ Skip to main content

Functional and Anatomical Specificity in a Higher Olfactory Centre

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
73 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional and Anatomical Specificity in a Higher Olfactory Centre
Published in
bioRxiv, June 2018
DOI 10.1101/336982
Authors

Shahar Frechter, Alexander S. Bates, Sina Tootoonian, Michael-John Dolan, James D. Manton, Arian Jamasb, Johannes Kohl, Davi Bock, Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 32%
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#614,156
of 16,298,489 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#6,333
of 103,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,292
of 282,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#303
of 5,366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,298,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.