↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Harassment of WomenClimate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Sexual Harassment of WomenClimate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 7,959)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Harassment of WomenClimate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Published by
The National Academies Press, June 2018
DOI 10.17226/24994
Pubmed ID
ISBNs
978-0-309-47087-2, 978-0-309-47085-8, 978-0-309-47086-5, 978-0-309-47084-1, 978-0-309-47088-9, 978-0-309-47089-6, 978-0-309-47091-9, 978-0-309-47090-2
Authors

Committee on the Impacts of Sexual Harrassment in Academic Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Committee on the Impacts of Sexual Harassment in Academic Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Paula A. Johnson, Sheila E. Widnall, and Frazier F. Benya, Editors; Committee on the Impacts of Sexual Harassment in Academia; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Editors

Paula A. Johnson, Sheila E. Widnall, Frazier F. Benya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,149 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 3%
Student > Master 1 1%
Professor 1 1%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 75 94%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2463. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#422
of 13,091,633 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#7
of 7,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 270,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#1
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,091,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.