↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Harassment of WomenClimate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Sexual Harassment of WomenClimate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 8,664)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sexual Harassment of WomenClimate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Published by
The National Academies Press, June 2018
DOI 10.17226/24994
Pubmed ID
ISBNs
978-0-309-47087-2, 978-0-309-47085-8, 978-0-309-47086-5, 978-0-309-47084-1, 978-0-309-47088-9, 978-0-309-47089-6, 978-0-309-47091-9, 978-0-309-47090-2
Authors

Committee on the Impacts of Sexual Harrassment in Academic Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Committee on the Impacts of Sexual Harassment in Academic Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Paula A. Johnson, Sheila E. Widnall, and Frazier F. Benya, Editors; Committee on the Impacts of Sexual Harassment in Academia; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Editors

Paula A. Johnson, Sheila E. Widnall, Frazier F. Benya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,299 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 60 32%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 14%
Psychology 21 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 56 30%
Unknown 45 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3087. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#764
of 16,292,334 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#6
of 8,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 282,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#1
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,292,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.