↓ Skip to main content

Problems with interpretation of transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR)

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Ultrasound Journal, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Problems with interpretation of transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR)
Published in
Critical Ultrasound Journal, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13089-018-0095-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Achyut Sharma, Diptesh Aryal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,145,168
of 13,044,081 outputs
Outputs from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#100
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,150
of 270,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,044,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them