You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Internal standard versus external standard calibration: an uncertainty case study of a liquid chromatography analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Química Nova, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-40422010000400041 |
| Authors |
Elcio Cruz de Oliveira, Edson I. Muller, Fernanda Abad, Juliana Dallarosa, Cristine Adriano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 57 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 37 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 64 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Química Nova
#32
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,265
of 172,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Química Nova
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.