↓ Skip to main content

Footwear in cricket: issues facing podiatrists treating fast bowlers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Footwear in cricket: issues facing podiatrists treating fast bowlers
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-4-s1-p5
Authors

Chris Bishop, Dominic Thewlis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,815,908
of 5,422,321 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#280
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,254
of 189,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#29
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,422,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.