↓ Skip to main content

Alteração no comportamento alimentar de trabalhadores de turnos de um frigorífico do sul do Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alteração no comportamento alimentar de trabalhadores de turnos de um frigorífico do sul do Brasil
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015208.18642014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisângela da Silva de Freitas, Raquel Canuto, Ruth Liane Henn, Beatriz Anselmo Olinto, Jamile Block Araldi Macagnan, Marcos Pascoal Pattussi, Fernanda Michelin Busnello, Maria Teresa Anselmo Olinto

Abstract

The relationship between shift work and the eatinghabits of workers was investigated in a slaughterhouse in southern Brazil. It involved a cross-sectional study with 1,206 workers of both sexes between 18 and 50 years of age. A standardized questionnaire was used to gather demographic, socioeconomic, work shift and eating habit information. The shift of work was categorized into daytime and nighttime, based on the starting and ending times of the shift. The eating habits of workers were evaluated as follows: number and type of meals eaten during the 24 hours of a normal day, the inappropriateness of the hoursof these meals and the dietaryrisk score. This was built on the risk score of the weekly consumption of 13 food items. After adjusting for potential confounders, non-Caucasian and younger male workers were more likely to manifest eating risk habits. Nighttimeshift workers consumed ahigher number of meals/day with greater inappropriateness of meal times than daytimeshift workers. The night shift can negatively influence the eating habits of workers of that shift.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Unspecified 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 27 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,510
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,331
of 276,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#25
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.