↓ Skip to main content

The frequent evolutionary birth and death of functional promoters in mouse and human

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
40 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The frequent evolutionary birth and death of functional promoters in mouse and human
Published in
Genome Research, July 2015
DOI 10.1101/gr.190546.115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert S. Young, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Robin Andersson, Albin Sandelin, Hideya Kawaji, Masayoshi Itoh, Timo Lassmann, Piero Carninci, The FANTOM Consortium, Wendy A. Bickmore, Alistair R. Forrest, Martin S. Taylor

Abstract

Promoters are central to the regulation of gene expression. Changes in gene regulation are thought to underlie much of the adaptive diversification between species and phenotypic variation within populations. In contrast to earlier work emphasizing the importance of enhancer evolution and subtle sequence changes at promoters, we show that dramatic changes such as the complete gain and loss (collectively turnover) of functional promoters are common. Using quantitative measures of transcription initiation in both humans and mice across 52 matched tissues we discriminate promoter sequence gains from losses and resolve the lineage of changes. We also identify expression divergence and functional turnover between orthologous promoters, finding only the latter is associated with local sequence changes. Promoter turnover has occurred at the majority (>56%) of protein-coding genes since humans and mice diverged. Tissue-restricted promoters are the most evolutionarily volatile where retrotransposition is an important, but not the sole source of innovation. There is considerable heterogeneity of turnover rates between promoters in different tissues, but the consistency of these in both lineages suggests the same biological systems are similarly inclined to transcriptional rewiring. The genes affected by promoter turnover show evidence of adaptive evolution. In mice, promoters are primarily lost through deletion of the promoter containing sequence; whereas in humans, many promoters appear to be gradually decaying with weak transcriptional output and relaxed selective constraint. Our results suggest that promoter gain and loss is an important process in the evolutionary rewiring of gene regulation and may be a significant source of phenotypic diversification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 155 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 24%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 12 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 16 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#720,198
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#230
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,414
of 278,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.