You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis of pericardial cysts using diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging: A case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-1947-5-479 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asam Raja, Jonathon R. Walker, Maneesh Sud, Joe Du, Matthew Zeglinski, Andrew Czarnecki, Negareh Mousavi, Davinder S. Jassal, Iain D. C. Kirkpatrick |
| Abstract |
Congenital pericardial cysts are benign lesions that arise from the pericardium during embryonic development. The diagnosis is based on typical imaging features, but atypical locations and signal magnetic resonance imaging sequences make it difficult to exclude other lesions. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a novel method that can be used to differentiate tissues based on their restriction to proton diffusion. Its use in differentiating pericardial cysts from other pericardial lesions has not yet been described. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,496
of 3,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,914
of 130,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#24
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.