You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cuts and poor health: when and how can we say that one thing causes another?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0141076818779237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucinda Hiam, Danny Dorling, Martin McKee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 35 | 57% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 21% |
| Scientists | 11 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#534,284
of 24,544,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#165
of 2,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,261
of 334,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,544,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.