↓ Skip to main content

Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003439.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Lovato, Allison Watts, Lindsay F Stead

Abstract

The tobacco industry denies that their marketing is targeted at young nonsmokers, but it seems more probable that tobacco advertising and promotion influences the attitudes of nonsmoking adolescents, and makes them more likely to try smoking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 228 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 16%
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Unspecified 17 7%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 53 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 24%
Unspecified 31 13%
Social Sciences 28 12%
Psychology 23 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 53 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#453,227
of 13,601,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,349
of 10,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,714
of 108,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,601,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.