You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the reconstruction of palaeo-ice sheets: Recent advances and future challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.07.016 |
| Authors |
Chris R. Stokes, Lev Tarasov, Robin Blomdin, Thomas M. Cronin, Timothy G. Fisher, Richard Gyllencreutz, Clas Hättestrand, Jakob Heyman, Richard C.A. Hindmarsh, Anna L.C. Hughes, Martin Jakobsson, Nina Kirchner, Stephen J. Livingstone, Martin Margold, Julian B. Murton, Riko Noormets, W. Richard Peltier, Dorothy M. Peteet, David J.W. Piper, Frank Preusser, Hans Renssen, David H. Roberts, Didier M. Roche, Francky Saint-Ange, Arjen P. Stroeven, James T. Teller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 29% |
| Researcher | 50 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Professor | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 149 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 65 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,949,373
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#1,327
of 4,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,044
of 290,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#21
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.