↓ Skip to main content

On the reconstruction of palaeo-ice sheets: Recent advances and future challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the reconstruction of palaeo-ice sheets: Recent advances and future challenges
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.07.016
Authors

Chris R. Stokes, Lev Tarasov, Robin Blomdin, Thomas M. Cronin, Timothy G. Fisher, Richard Gyllencreutz, Clas Hättestrand, Jakob Heyman, Richard C.A. Hindmarsh, Anna L.C. Hughes, Martin Jakobsson, Nina Kirchner, Stephen J. Livingstone, Martin Margold, Julian B. Murton, Riko Noormets, W. Richard Peltier, Dorothy M. Peteet, David J.W. Piper, Frank Preusser, Hans Renssen, David H. Roberts, Didier M. Roche, Francky Saint-Ange, Arjen P. Stroeven, James T. Teller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 205 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 31%
Researcher 43 20%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Professor 10 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 132 62%
Environmental Science 22 10%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 42 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,775,011
of 12,292,260 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#491
of 2,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,300
of 240,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#23
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,292,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.