↓ Skip to main content

The demise of the largest and oldest African baobabs

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 993)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
200 news outlets
blogs
20 blogs
twitter
1805 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The demise of the largest and oldest African baobabs
Published in
Nature Plants, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41477-018-0170-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Patrut, Stephan Woodborne, Roxana T. Patrut, Laszlo Rakosy, Daniel A. Lowy, Grant Hall, Karl F. von Reden

Abstract

The African baobab is the biggest and longest-living angiosperm tree. By using radiocarbon dating we identified the stable architectures that enable baobabs to reach large sizes and great ages. We report that 9 of the 13 oldest and 5 of the 6 largest individuals have died, or at least their oldest parts/stems have collapsed and died, over the past 12 years; the cause of the mortalities is still unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,805 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Unspecified 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Lecturer 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Unspecified 9 22%
Environmental Science 8 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 6 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#583
of 13,535,736 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#2
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22
of 268,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,535,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.