↓ Skip to main content

Individual patient education for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual patient education for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004057.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arno J Engers, Petra Jellema, Michel Wensing, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Richard Grol, Maurits W van Tulder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 329 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 19%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 41 12%
Other 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 10%
Other 124 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 177 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 16%
Unspecified 45 13%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Psychology 15 4%
Other 39 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,928,789
of 12,963,942 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,549
of 10,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,423
of 107,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,963,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.