↓ Skip to main content

Individual patient education for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
476 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual patient education for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004057.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arno J Engers, Petra Jellema, Michel Wensing, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Richard Grol, Maurits W van Tulder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 457 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 19%
Student > Bachelor 64 13%
Researcher 50 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Student > Postgraduate 46 10%
Other 117 25%
Unknown 61 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 200 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 18%
Psychology 21 4%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Other 49 10%
Unknown 87 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#784,242
of 16,029,158 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,149
of 11,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,538
of 116,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,029,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.