↓ Skip to main content

Spatial Patterns of Development Drive Water Use

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial Patterns of Development Drive Water Use
Published in
Water Resources Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1002/2017wr021730
Authors

G. M. Sanchez, J. W. Smith, A. Terando, G. Sun, R. K. Meentemeyer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 33%
Engineering 5 21%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 4 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#9,867,300
of 12,359,775 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#2,293
of 2,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,090
of 268,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#47
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,359,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.