@DavidMichaelRi8 @ChasO2018 https://t.co/ZUgqfN3LLg https://t.co/LsWPVB3ljS Antarctica total volume of ice = 27000000 km^3 East Antarctica ice sheet makes up 91.3% of total East Antarctica, had an average rate of mass gain over the period 1992–2017 (5 ± 4
RT @alexaraujoc: @rafaelmourao29 @AdrianoGianturc @IPCC_CH O estudo mais completo e mais recente talvez seja este de Shepherd et al. (uma l…
RT @alexaraujoc: @rafaelmourao29 @AdrianoGianturc @IPCC_CH O estudo mais completo e mais recente talvez seja este de Shepherd et al. (uma l…
@saul_good_bro @dwebspider @NPR Zwally's results were an outlier – the only one showing this, with assumptions about ice density. He said his method shows crossover to net melt already, in 2017 https://t.co/tnAfJQWGQQ And here's a recent summary combining
https://t.co/VKVQMuLBUP "#Mass #balance of the #Antarctic #Ice #Sheet from 1992 to 2017".
28. Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017 https://t.co/uXsNI7CA7V
@arpsej91 @ockhams @JanCeesVogelaar De belangrijkste factor bij het smelten van de ijskap op Antarctica is niet de luchttemperatuur maar het wegsmelten van de ijsplaten aan basis: https://t.co/y7YHDztW0Y JH Zie ook: https://t.co/arZvrodTa8
@corycolt @Poisoned0003 @BernieSanders That was one paper's finding (Zwally). Most other papers thought net melt all along. Disagreements in satellite techniques, altimetry vs. gravimetry. Zwally now also says it looks like net melt. Here's a recent paper
@ShawnBeckman1 @Poisoned0003 @BernieSanders Why do you tell them this? What evidence supports it? I'm guessing you heard about either Antarctic sea ice, or the Zwally paper. Both get a lot of circulation in partisan news sources – both are pretty out of d
@Poisoned0003 @BernieSanders Hi Katelyn, what did you read that made you think this? Here's a paper you can read that gets into the interesting details of Antarctic ice melt. https://t.co/ybNYa3phLQ You may have read that southern *sea ice* is growing. T
No #globalcooling No #miniiceage! Antarctic net ice loss. It is growing! https://t.co/51erL53rVJ
@PrustAdriano @Denysdenys @revistapiaui @folha Outros estudos com um satélite mais avançado que calcula a variação de gravidade quando sobrevoa uma região pra calcular a massa dessa região, com os satélites GRACE mostraram que a perda é, de fato, muito mai
@SlugBub @Davewil17375287 ‘Just’ West Antarctica vs the whole sheet. https://t.co/6bTMenCp85
@AtheistJacob @SimonVanDeBeek @westergeest @LeoPeterzz @Doctersr De nieuwste studies laten opnieuw zien dat de ijskap op Antarctica als geheel massa verliest, zie images uit resp.: https://t.co/BdZChnqxBP https://t.co/D6Il79i491 JH https://t.co/MNQTFm1CaO
@sherriebling @JoeBiden I don't think he has an inkling of what the situation is. Antarctica ice loss: to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, which corresponds to an increase in mean sea level of 7.6 ± 3.9 millimet
Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017 | Nature https://t.co/syPBaxXvdt
@dpecchia @kevpluck @simongerman600 That's one recent source. Also have a look at https://t.co/taAxGnbCYg which shows results from all 3 methods.
@kmtildsley Sure, here as 219 ± 43 Gt yr−1: https://t.co/GVj34h9Gul
@cosaingalway @rdlarter @ClimateAudit @kevpluck @simongerman600 Yes, Imbie team finds over a tripling of melt rate just since 1992. https://t.co/ybNYa3phLQ https://t.co/COZ2AdOYpi
@bentir @kevpluck @steamy_m00nsta @_SoccerThoughts @yashar That was the expectation on East Antarctica IMBIE team 2018, "Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017" "lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017..." https:/
@FrackerDave @Schneider14510 @GeraldKutney @tan123 Glaciers aren't growing in *general*. What's wrong with you, how gullible can you be? Do you not know what cherry picking fallacies even are? There are articles on critical thinking online. https://t.co/U
RT @rdlarter: Surprising coincidence with accelerating loss of polar land ice: https://t.co/8YH07RcNiI https://t.co/TUsfSlklMM … https://t.…
RT @rdlarter: Surprising coincidence with accelerating loss of polar land ice: https://t.co/8YH07RcNiI https://t.co/TUsfSlklMM … https://t.…
Surprising coincidence with accelerating loss of polar land ice: https://t.co/8YH07RcNiI https://t.co/TUsfSlklMM … https://t.co/43q6YQG8XX … /sarc
RT @reyesmm09: La capa de hielo en la Antártida se esta perdiendo con gran escala, como efecto de aviso al cambio climático fuerte que esta…
@zac1967 @viktorgiacobbo @srfnews @tagesanzeiger @NZZ Die ostantarktische Eisfläche wurde seither mehrmals in anderen Studien ausgemessen. Mit gegenteiligem Ergebnis. Wieso machst du nicht auch auf die aufmerksam? z.B. hier: https://t.co/0qcE1Z6zt0 und hie
RT @reyesmm09: La capa de hielo en la Antártida se esta perdiendo con gran escala, como efecto de aviso al cambio climático fuerte que esta…
RT @reyesmm09: La capa de hielo en la Antártida se esta perdiendo con gran escala, como efecto de aviso al cambio climático fuerte que esta…
La capa de hielo en la Antártida se esta perdiendo con gran escala, como efecto de aviso al cambio climático fuerte que esta sucediendo. #science #antartida @Pcasbri 📰https://t.co/5ikQ4NDCEW 📗https://t.co/Bvov6eWaBa https://t.co/Kf30uX9qKn
@3farbig @Twitschertroll @de_alphawolf @annaesch1 @SylRie04 @polenz_r @CDU Nein, aber Nature https://t.co/dcULlTiZZG
@SenTomCotton No more standing by. Antarctic ice loss: to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, which corresponds to an increase in mean sea level of 7.6 ± 3.9 millimetres https://t.co/GyhfSp8d45 https://t.co/mvhcgE
@Kunashir1963 @EcoSenseNow Or? Here we combine satellite observations of its changing volume, flow and gravitational attraction with modelling of its surface mass balance to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, … ht
@nsromaine @NBCNews @NBCNewsMACH from 2017 and in 2018 Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017 "we combine satellite observations of its changing volume, flow and gravitational attraction ... to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion ton
@pootlam @demorgen Deze studie gaat maar tot 2008, en is sindsdien door verschillende andere studies weerlegd. https://t.co/XbKuEprekw https://t.co/Mz8xGTxtra https://t.co/aZ9os3HHXe https://t.co/b4x2fKEHLO https://t.co/M6RiUV8z7d https://t.co/dLZ6eLhN1r
RT @AndyShep_CPOM: Ice losses from Antarctica have tripled over the past 25 years https://t.co/C7IbLN5lEq
RT @AndyShep_CPOM: Ice losses from Antarctica have tripled over the past 25 years https://t.co/C7IbLN5lEq
@MichaelEMann @EcoWatch Bad news from the South Pole. https://t.co/zHpd0ATNgK
@CarDudeTopanga @patsonov @NASAClimate Re: "You sited [sic] one paper" Some others: Velicogna 2009 - https://t.co/pdZcShuKh9 Shepherd et al 2012 - https://t.co/xDUrbQZccY Irvins et al 2012 - https://t.co/YKIitsfiEU Shepherd et al 2018 - https://t.co/6GIF0
A siyenzz update🏆😳😳
@ABlackAmericanM @bendynaa @PhilosophySeel When one quotes articles, you should try to find the most recent findings. "The findings dispel the idea that East Antarctica has been gaining enough ice from snowfall to cancel out losses in West Antarctica, Oppe
@BrandonLent17 @NASA @NASAJPL Here's the latest, most comprehensive study: https://t.co/BDPQlvwMZ2
@BernhardGeyer @HalleVerkehrt @ForchheimEka @FridayForFuture Es gibt einen Haufen Paper zur Antarktis und wie deren Eispanzer reagiert. Die schätzen die Lage z.T. unterschiedlich ein. Die relevanteste Studie in dem Bereich ist diese: https://t.co/Pnw15vmX1
@NJSnowFan Here are a couple of recent assessments of Antarctic ice loss and one of Arctic land ice loss: https://t.co/a1cu6m8qBC (6-fold increase in loss over 30 years) https://t.co/taAxGnbCYg https://t.co/xTyBc889R0 (acceleration of ice loss in all regio
Ice losses from Antarctica have tripled over the past 25 years https://t.co/C7IbLN5lEq
#jrs_ice Ice sheet lost 3 trillion tons in 25 years: https://t.co/1L5q5Xyymg
19. Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017 https://t.co/uXsNI7CA7V
@benocialism Re: "hmm, predictions of West Antarctic ice collapse 50 years from then would be… well, right about now, huh?" No. 2019 - 1978 = 41. 41 is not 50. 🤦♂️ https://t.co/yxDJMblZjy https://t.co/BuqSu3Aaej