You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protection from UV light is an evolutionarily conserved feature of the haematopoietic niche
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0213-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Friedrich G. Kapp, Julie R. Perlin, Elliott J. Hagedorn, John M. Gansner, Daniel E. Schwarz, Lauren A. O’Connell, Nicholas S. Johnson, Chris Amemiya, David E. Fisher, Ute Wölfle, Eirini Trompouki, Charlotte M. Niemeyer, Wolfgang Driever, Leonard I. Zon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 230 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 67 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 10% |
| Germany | 10 | 4% |
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 3 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 74 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 48% |
| Scientists | 105 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
| Researcher | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 63 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#168,754
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#10,422
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,592
of 345,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#213
of 947 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 947 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.