↓ Skip to main content

Mapping the spatial distribution of the biomass and filter‐feeding effect of invasive dreissenid mussels on the winter‐spring phytoplankton bloom in Lake Michigan

Overview of attention for article published in Freshwater Biology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Mapping the spatial distribution of the biomass and filter‐feeding effect of invasive dreissenid mussels on the winter‐spring phytoplankton bloom in Lake Michigan
Published in
Freshwater Biology, August 2015
DOI 10.1111/fwb.12653
Authors

Mark D. Rowe, Daniel R. Obenour, Thomas F. Nalepa, Henry A. Vanderploeg, Foad Yousef, W. Charles Kerfoot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Engineering 9 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,457,804
of 24,742,536 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#284
of 2,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,167
of 269,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#3
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,742,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.