↓ Skip to main content

Media devices in pre-school children: the recommendations of the Italian pediatric society

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 589)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Media devices in pre-school children: the recommendations of the Italian pediatric society
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13052-018-0508-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Bozzola, Giulia Spina, Margherita Ruggiero, Luigi Memo, Rino Agostiniani, Mauro Bozzola, Giovanni Corsello, Alberto Villani

Abstract

Young children are too often exposed to mobile devices (MD) and most of them had their own device. The adverse effects of a early and prolonged exposure to digital technology on pre-school children has been described by several studies. Aim of the study is to analyze the consequences of MD exposure in pre-school children. We analyzed the documented effects of media exposure on children's mental and physical health. According to recent studies, MD may interfere with learning, children development, well being, sleep, sight, listening, caregiver-child relationship. Pediatricians should be aware of both the beneficial and side effects of MD and give advice to the families, according to children's age. In according to literature, the Italian Pediatric Society suggest that the media device exposure in childhood should be modulated by supervisors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 5 5%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Psychology 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 28 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#202,580
of 15,662,611 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#4
of 589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,263
of 279,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,662,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them