The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 194 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prospectively Isolated Tetraspanin+ Neoblasts Are Adult Pluripotent Stem Cells Underlying Planaria Regeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cell, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
An Zeng, Hua Li, Longhua Guo, Xin Gao, Sean McKinney, Yongfu Wang, Zulin Yu, Jungeun Park, Craig Semerad, Eric Ross, Li-Chun Cheng, Erin Davies, Kai Lei, Wei Wang, Anoja Perera, Kate Hall, Allison Peak, Andrew Box, Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 34 | 18% |
Germany | 6 | 3% |
India | 6 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Japan | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Austria | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Unknown | 124 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 101 | 52% |
Scientists | 85 | 44% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 383 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 21% |
Researcher | 52 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 44 | 11% |
Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
Other | 53 | 14% |
Unknown | 102 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 146 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
Computer Science | 5 | 1% |
Other | 22 | 6% |
Unknown | 114 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 312. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#117,130
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#675
of 17,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,529
of 346,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#18
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.