You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-015-0091-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Röver, Guido Knapp, Tim Friede |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 26% |
| Mathematics | 12 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,082,883
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,203
of 2,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,971
of 282,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.