You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Contextual Radiology Reporting: A New Approach to Neuroradiology Structured Templates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a5697 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.D. Mamlouk, P.C. Chang, R.R. Saket |
| Abstract |
Structured reporting has many advantages over conventional narrative reporting and has been advocated for standard usage by radiologic societies and literature. Traditional structured reports though are often not tailored to the appropriate clinical situation, are generic, and can be overly constraining. Contextual reporting is an alternative method of structured reporting that is specifically related to the disease or examination indication. Herein, we create a library of 50 contextual structured reports for neuroradiologists and emphasize their clinical value over noncontextual structured reporting. These templates are located in the On-line Appendix, and a downloadable PowerScribe 360 file may be accessed at https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AlPUmfAXPzjkMFcHf7vGKF4Q-vIdpflT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 38% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 28% |
| Scientists | 14 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 63% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#611,238
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#34
of 5,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,473
of 334,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.