↓ Skip to main content

Facial asymmetry: a current review

Overview of attention for article published in Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facial asymmetry: a current review
Published in
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.110-125.sar
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Thiesen, Bruno Frazão Gribel, Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas

Abstract

The term "asymmetry" is used to make reference to dissimilarity between homologous elements, altering the balance between structures. Facial asymmetry is common in the overall population and is often presented subclinically. Nevertheless, on occasion, significant facial asymmetry results not only in functional, but also esthetic issues. Under these conditions, its etiology should be carefully investigated in order to achieve an adequate treatment plan. Facial asymmetry assessment comprises patient's first interview, extra- as well as intraoral clinical examination, and supplementary imaging examination. Subsequent asymmetry treatment depends on patient's age, the etiology of the condition and on the degree of disharmony, and might include from asymmetrical orthodontic mechanics to orthognathic surgery. Thus, the present study aims at addressing important aspects to be considered by the orthodontist reaching an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan of facial asymmetry, in addition to reporting treatment of some patients carriers of such challenging disharmony.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 238 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 41 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 15%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 15 6%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 71 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 81 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,196,769
of 22,070,821 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#3
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,521
of 300,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,070,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them