↓ Skip to main content

How Is the Myth of “Male Physical Superiority” Sustained?

Overview of attention for article published in Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Is the Myth of “Male Physical Superiority” Sustained?
Published in
Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2004
DOI 10.11151/eds1951.75.105
Authors

Keiko HATANO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#133
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,280
of 145,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.