↓ Skip to main content

Course and prognosis of recovery for chronic non-specific low back pain: design, therapy program and baseline data of a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Course and prognosis of recovery for chronic non-specific low back pain: design, therapy program and baseline data of a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Verkerk, Pim AJ Luijsterburg, Inge Ronchetti, Harald S Miedema, Annelies Pool-Goudzwaard, Jan-Paul van Wingerden, Bart W Koes

Abstract

There has been increasing focus on factors predicting the development of chronic musculoskeletal disorders. For patients already experiencing chronic non-specific low back pain it is also relevant to investigate which prognostic factors predict recovery. We present the design of a cohort study that aims to determine the course and prognostic factors for recovery in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Other 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 11 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 21%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 19 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2011.
All research outputs
#1,946,533
of 4,695,624 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#731
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,604
of 72,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#32
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,695,624 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.