↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.003
Authors

Robert J. Lennox, Austin J. Gallagher, Euan G. Ritchie, Steven J. Cooke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Unspecified 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 46%
Environmental Science 26 29%
Unspecified 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#329,254
of 12,844,797 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#261
of 3,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,544
of 268,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#15
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,844,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.