↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
56 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.003
Authors

Robert J. Lennox, Austin J. Gallagher, Euan G. Ritchie, Steven J. Cooke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 41%
Environmental Science 48 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 34 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#504,957
of 16,124,918 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#440
of 4,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,986
of 278,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#19
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,124,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.