↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.003
Authors

Robert J. Lennox, Austin J. Gallagher, Euan G. Ritchie, Steven J. Cooke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Unspecified 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 45%
Environmental Science 21 28%
Unspecified 11 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#307,678
of 12,533,239 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#242
of 3,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,266
of 271,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#17
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,533,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.