↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.003
Authors

Robert J. Lennox, Austin J. Gallagher, Euan G. Ritchie, Steven J. Cooke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 42%
Environmental Science 38 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 25 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#399,534
of 14,375,009 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#344
of 4,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,818
of 274,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#17
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,375,009 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.