↓ Skip to main content

Rapid 3-D analysis of rockfalls

Overview of attention for article published in GSA Today, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

3 news outlets

Readers on

16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Rapid 3-D analysis of rockfalls
Published in
GSA Today, June 2018
DOI 10.1130/gsatg374gw.1

Greg M. Stock, Antoine Guerin, Nikita Avdievitch, Brian D. Collins, Michel Jaboyedoff

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Professor 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 63%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
of 13,153,703 outputs
Outputs from GSA Today
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 268,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GSA Today
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,153,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them