↓ Skip to main content

La violencia interpersonal en España a través del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
La violencia interpersonal en España a través del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.02.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Carlo Gil-Borrelli, Pello Latasa Zamalloa, María Dolores Martín Ríos, M. Ángeles Rodríguez Arenas

Abstract

To describe the epidemiology of interpersonal violence in Spain. Descriptive study of the cases of patients with secondary diagnosis of aggression registered on a national hospital discharge database, between 1999 and 2011, using the codes from E960 to E969 of the ICD-9. The distribution by sex, age and type of discharge, associated morbidity, mortality and by autonomous community is described. The quality of the record is studied according to its temporal variation. The case profile of aggression in men (85%) is of a patient between 15 and 44 years old, who in 93.7% of cases requires urgent care and whose severity is moderate (95% discharge home). Two point five percent of patients are readmitted and death occurs in1.1%. The profile in women (15%) differs slightly, with an age between 31 and 52 years, 94% require urgent attention, although 96% have moderate severity; 3% are readmitted and 1.7% die. Although they need to be improved to avoid certain limitations, health information systems are a rich source of data that can be used for research in health and, through their results, for the development of prevention plans and intervention in matters of violence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 26%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Engineering 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,066,737
of 15,751,434 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#157
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,044
of 277,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,751,434 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.