↓ Skip to main content

Preparing the next generation of genomicists: a laboratory-style course in medical genomics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preparing the next generation of genomicists: a laboratory-style course in medical genomics
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12920-015-0124-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D. Linderman, Ali Bashir, George A. Diaz, Andrew Kasarskis, Saskia C. Sanderson, Randi E. Zinberg, Milind Mahajan, Hardik Shah, Sabrina Suckiel, Micol Zweig, Eric E. Schadt

Abstract

The growing gap between the demand for genome sequencing and the supply of trained genomics professionals is creating an acute need to develop more effective genomics education. In response we developed "Practical Analysis of Your Personal Genome", a novel laboratory-style medical genomics course in which students have the opportunity to obtain and analyze their own whole genome. This report describes our motivations for and the content of a "practical" genomics course that incorporates personal genome sequencing and the lessons we learned during the first three iterations of this course.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Computer Science 5 14%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,997,623
of 24,260,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#108
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,048
of 268,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,260,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.