You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Political implications of science popularisation strategies: Frontiers of Science
|
---|---|
Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1177/0963662515597186 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maureen Burns |
Abstract |
This examination of the mediation strategies of a very popular factual science comic strip series from the 1960s and 1970s illustrates, in this case by highlighting the ways in which women were targeted as an audience, that science popularisations are always political. For that reason, they should not be evaluated merely in terms of scientific accuracy. I demonstrate tensions between the dissemination model of communication used in the distribution of science popularisations, on the one hand, with the advocacy of a dialogue model in their content, on the other. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 9 | 43% |
Psychology | 2 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,408,178
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#633
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,385
of 264,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.