The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Portfolio Framework for Prioritizing Conservation Efforts for Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Populations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fisheries, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/fsh.10137 |
Authors |
Robert Al‐Chokhachy, Bradley B. Shepard, Jason C. Burckhardt, Dan Garren, Scott Opitz, Todd M. Koel, Lee Nelson, Robert E. Gresswell |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 6 | 21% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 32% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries
#502
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,765
of 345,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.