↓ Skip to main content

Arctic soil microbial diversity in a changing world

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Microbiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arctic soil microbial diversity in a changing world
Published in
Research in Microbiology, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.07.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aimeric Blaud, Thomas Z. Lerch, Gareth K. Phoenix, A. Mark Osborn

Abstract

The Arctic region is a unique environment, subject to extreme environmental conditions, shaping life therein and contributing to its sensitivity to environmental change. The Arctic is under increasing environmental pressure from anthropogenic activity and global warming. The unique microbial diversity of Arctic regions, that has a critical role in biogeochemical cycling and in the production of greenhouse gases, will be directly affected by and affect, global changes. This article reviews current knowledge and understanding of microbial taxonomic and functional diversity in Arctic soils, the contributions of microbial diversity to ecosystem processes and their responses to environmental change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 27%
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 39%
Environmental Science 23 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,769,361
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Research in Microbiology
#92
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,763
of 276,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Microbiology
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.