↓ Skip to main content

Problem-solving therapy for depression and common mental disorders in Zimbabwe: piloting a task-shifting primary mental health care intervention in a population with a high prevalence of people…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
521 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Problem-solving therapy for depression and common mental disorders in Zimbabwe: piloting a task-shifting primary mental health care intervention in a population with a high prevalence of people living with HIV
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-828
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dixon Chibanda, Petra Mesu, Lazarus Kajawu, Frances Cowan, Ricardo Araya, Melanie A Abas

Abstract

There is limited evidence that interventions for depression and other common mental disorders (CMD) can be integrated sustainably into primary health care in Africa. We aimed to pilot a low-cost multi-component 'Friendship Bench Intervention' for CMD, locally adapted from problem-solving therapy and delivered by trained and supervised female lay workers to learn if was feasible and possibly effective as well as how best to implement it on a larger scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 521 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 504 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 18%
Researcher 84 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Student > Postgraduate 38 7%
Other 98 19%
Unknown 98 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 25%
Psychology 82 16%
Social Sciences 63 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Other 59 11%
Unknown 118 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#225,013
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#200
of 16,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#799
of 144,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.