↓ Skip to main content

Stability of hexaquarks in the string limit of confinement

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Stability of hexaquarks in the string limit of confinement
Published in
Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, January 2012
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.85.014019
Authors

J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, J.-M. Richard

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,562,202
of 12,368,538 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#1,761
of 13,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,755
of 237,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#37
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,368,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.