↓ Skip to main content

Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Monographs, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 781)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
77 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear
Published in
Ecological Monographs, June 2018
DOI 10.1002/ecm.1313
Authors

Michel T. Kohl, Daniel R. Stahler, Matthew C. Metz, James D. Forester, Matthew J. Kauffman, Nathan Varley, P. J. White, Douglas W. Smith, Daniel R. MacNulty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 326 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 19%
Researcher 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 3%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 54 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 48%
Environmental Science 72 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 70 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#231,702
of 17,902,988 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#11
of 781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,975
of 285,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,902,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.