↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the importance of abiotic and biotic drivers on Bythotrephes biomass in Lakes Superior and Michigan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the importance of abiotic and biotic drivers on Bythotrephes biomass in Lakes Superior and Michigan
Published in
Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.07.010
Authors

K.M. Keeler, D.B. Bunnell, J.S. Diana, J.V. Adams, J.G. Mychek-Londer, D.M. Warner, D.L. Yule, M.R. Vinson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 28%
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#11,886,900
of 18,240,594 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#961
of 1,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,065
of 246,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,240,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.