↓ Skip to main content

O uso da aromaterapia na melhora da autoestima

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 618)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
O uso da aromaterapia na melhora da autoestima
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, October 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0080-62342011000500012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Rizzo Gnatta, Maria Filomena Mourão Zotelli, Dulce Regina Batista Carmo, Cristiane de Lion Botero Couto Lopes, Noemi Marisa Brunet Rogenski, Maria Júlia Paes da Silva

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to verify if inhaling rose and ylang-ylang essential oils has any effect on one's perception of self-esteem, and compare their efficiency. The study was approved by the University of São Paulo Hospital Research Ethics Committee. Participants were 43 workers from the Sanitation Department and from the Materials and Sterilization Center, and the study took place from May to July 2009. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: two that received the essential oils and a third that received placebo (rose essence). The self-esteem evaluation was performed using a scale validated in Brazil, which was applied before using the aromas, as well as 30 and 60 days after the use. Results showed that the sample consisted of 88.6% individuals with medium and high self-esteem, and that the essential oils did not make any significant changes to their perception of self-esteem.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,558,869
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#33
of 618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,118
of 132,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them