↓ Skip to main content

Computational Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computational Toxicology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Molecular Descriptors for Structure–Activity Applications: A Hands-On Approach
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The OECD QSAR Toolbox Starts Its Second Decade
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 QSAR: What Else?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 (Q)SARs as Adaptations to REACH Information Requirements
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Machine Learning Methods in Computational Toxicology
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Applicability Domain: A Step Toward Confident Predictions and Decidability for QSAR Modeling
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Molecular Similarity in Computational Toxicology
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Molecular Docking for Predictive Toxicology
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Criteria and Application on the Use of Nontesting Methods within a Weight of Evidence Strategy
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Characterization and Management of Uncertainties in Toxicological Risk Assessment: Examples from the Opinions of the European Food Safety Authority
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Computational Toxicology and Drug Discovery
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Approaching Pharmacological Space: Events and Components
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Computational Toxicology Methods in Chemical Library Design and High-Throughput Screening Hit Validation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Enalos Suite: New Cheminformatics Platform for Drug Discovery and Computational Toxicology
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Ion Channels in Drug Discovery and Safety Pharmacology
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Computational Approaches in Multitarget Drug Discovery
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Nanoformulations for Drug Delivery: Safety, Toxicity, and Efficacy
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Toxicity Potential of Nutraceuticals
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Impact of Pharmaceuticals on the Environment: Risk Assessment Using QSAR Modeling Approach
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 (Q)SAR Methods for Predicting Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity: Scientific Rationale and Regulatory Frameworks
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Stem Cell-Based Methods to Predict Developmental Chemical Toxicity
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Predicting Chemically Induced Skin Sensitization by Using In Chemico / In Vitro Methods
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Hepatotoxicity Prediction by Systems Biology Modeling of Disturbed Metabolic Pathways Using Gene Expression Data
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Nontest Methods to Predict Acute Toxicity: State of the Art for Applications of In Silico Methods
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Predictive Systems Toxicology
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Chemoinformatic Approach to Assess Toxicity of Ionic Liquids
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Prediction of Biochemical Endpoints by the CORAL Software: Prejudices, Paradoxes, and Results
Attention for Chapter 13: Computational Toxicology Methods in Chemical Library Design and High-Throughput Screening Hit Validation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Computational Toxicology Methods in Chemical Library Design and High-Throughput Screening Hit Validation
Chapter number 13
Book title
Computational Toxicology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7898-4, 978-1-4939-7899-1
Authors

Kirk E. Hevener

Abstract

The discovery of molecular toxicity in a clinical drug candidate can have a significant impact on both the cost and timeline of the drug discovery process. Early identification of potentially toxic compounds during screening library preparation or, alternatively, during the hit validation process, is critical to ensure that valuable time and resources are not spent pursuing compounds that may possess a high propensity for human toxicity. This chapter focuses on the application of computational molecular filters, applied either prescreening or postscreening, to identify and remove known reactive and/or potentially toxic compounds from consideration in drug discovery campaigns.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 33%
Computer Science 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,582,989
of 13,157,264 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,244
of 8,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,846
of 268,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,157,264 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,457 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them