↓ Skip to main content

Palaeoclimate constraints on the impact of 2 °C anthropogenic warming and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 2,560)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
540 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
5 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
Title
Palaeoclimate constraints on the impact of 2 °C anthropogenic warming and beyond
Published in
Nature Geoscience, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0146-0
Authors

Hubertus Fischer, Katrin J. Meissner, Alan C. Mix, Nerilie J. Abram, Jacqueline Austermann, Victor Brovkin, Emilie Capron, Daniele Colombaroli, Anne-Laure Daniau, Kelsey A. Dyez, Thomas Felis, Sarah A. Finkelstein, Samuel L. Jaccard, Erin L. McClymont, Alessio Rovere, Johannes Sutter, Eric W. Wolff, Stéphane Affolter, Pepijn Bakker, Juan Antonio Ballesteros-Cánovas, Carlo Barbante, Thibaut Caley, Anders E. Carlson, Olga Churakova, Giuseppe Cortese, Brian F. Cumming, Basil A. S. Davis, Anne de Vernal, Julien Emile-Geay, Sherilyn C. Fritz, Paul Gierz, Julia Gottschalk, Max D. Holloway, Fortunat Joos, Michal Kucera, Marie-France Loutre, Daniel J. Lunt, Katarzyna Marcisz, Jennifer R. Marlon, Philippe Martinez, Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Christoph Nehrbass-Ahles, Bette L. Otto-Bliesner, Christoph C. Raible, Bjørg Risebrobakken, María F. Sánchez Goñi, Jennifer Saleem Arrigo, Michael Sarnthein, Jesper Sjolte, Thomas F. Stocker, Patricio A. Velasquez Alvárez, Willy Tinner, Paul J. Valdes, Hendrik Vogel, Heinz Wanner, Qing Yan, Zicheng Yu, Martin Ziegler, Liping Zhou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 540 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 296 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Student > Master 26 9%
Professor 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 45 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 140 47%
Environmental Science 44 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 72 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 807. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,595
of 14,547,452 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#29
of 2,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348
of 273,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,547,452 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 80.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.