↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
610 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1800918115
Pubmed ID
Authors

William A. Walters, Zhao Jin, Nicholas Youngblut, Jason G. Wallace, Jessica Sutter, Wei Zhang, Antonio González-Peña, Jason Peiffer, Omry Koren, Qiaojuan Shi, Rob Knight, Tijana Glavina del Rio, Susannah G. Tringe, Edward S. Buckler, Jeffery L. Dangl, Ruth E. Ley

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 610 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 610 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 127 21%
Researcher 119 20%
Student > Master 55 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Student > Bachelor 32 5%
Other 90 15%
Unknown 145 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 293 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 10%
Environmental Science 35 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 1%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 167 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#523,114
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,992
of 104,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,933
of 345,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#167
of 933 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 933 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.