↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
454 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
615 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1800918115
Pubmed ID
Authors

William A. Walters, Zhao Jin, Nicholas Youngblut, Jason G. Wallace, Jessica Sutter, Wei Zhang, Antonio González-Peña, Jason Peiffer, Omry Koren, Qiaojuan Shi, Rob Knight, Tijana Glavina del Rio, Susannah G. Tringe, Edward S. Buckler, Jeffery L. Dangl, Ruth E. Ley

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 615 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 615 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 127 21%
Researcher 124 20%
Student > Master 55 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Student > Bachelor 32 5%
Other 90 15%
Unknown 145 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 298 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 10%
Environmental Science 35 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 1%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 167 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#541,889
of 26,745,229 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,220
of 105,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,122
of 346,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#169
of 933 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,745,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 933 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.