You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chromatin in 3D: progress and prospects for plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0738-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chang Liu, Detlef Weigel |
| Abstract |
Methods that use high-throughput sequencing have begun to reveal features of the three-dimensional structure of genomes at a resolution that goes far beyond that of traditional microscopy. Integration of these methods with other molecular tools has advanced our knowledge of both global and local chromatin packing in plants, and has revealed how patterns of chromatin packing correlate with the genomic and epigenomic landscapes. This update reports recent progress made in this area in plants, and suggests new research directions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 29% |
| Researcher | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,428
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,649
of 277,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#49
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.