↓ Skip to main content

Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Technology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 190)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Technology, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40781-018-0175-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Md Najmul Haque

Abstract

Methane emission from the enteric fermentation of ruminant livestock is a main source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and a major concern for global warming. Methane emission is also associated with dietary energy lose; hence, reduce feed efficiency. Due to the negative environmental impacts, methane mitigation has come forward in last few decades. To date numerous efforts were made in order to reduce methane emission from ruminants. No table mitigation approaches are rumen manipulation, alteration of rumen fermentation, modification of rumen microbial biodiversity by different means and rarely by animal manipulations. However, a comprehensive exploration for a sustainable methane mitigation approach is still lacking. Dietary modification is directly linked to changes in the rumen fermentation pattern and types of end products. Studies showed that changing fermentation pattern is one of the most effective ways of methane abatement. Desirable dietary changes provide two fold benefits i.e. improve production and reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, the aim of this review is to discuss biology of methane emission from ruminants and its mitigation through dietary manipulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 438 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 15%
Researcher 46 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 10%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 155 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 31 7%
Environmental Science 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Engineering 14 3%
Other 45 10%
Unknown 166 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,169,870
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Technology
#4
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,985
of 341,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Technology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them