↓ Skip to main content

Absorption of sugars in the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus): a paradox explained

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Biology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Absorption of sugars in the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus): a paradox explained
Published in
Journal of Experimental Biology, May 2007
DOI 10.1242/jeb.02766
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher R. Tracy, Todd J. McWhorter, Carmi Korine, Michal S. Wojciechowski, Berry Pinshow, William H. Karasov, Tracy CR, McWhorter TJ, Korine C, Wojciechowski MS, Pinshow B, Karasov WH, C. R. Tracy, T. J. McWhorter, C. Korine, M. S. Wojciechowski, B. Pinshow, W. H. Karasov

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 69 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 52%
Environmental Science 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Unknown 22 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,936,064
of 5,521,583 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#2,448
of 3,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,966
of 193,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#96
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,521,583 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.