You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum: Corrigendum: Worldwide variations in artificial skyglow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep12180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher C. M. Kyba, Kai Pong Tong, Jonathan Bennie, Ignacio Birriel, Jennifer J. Birriel, Andrew Cool, Arne Danielsen, Thomas W. Davies, Peter N. den Outer, William Edwards, Rainer Ehlert, Fabio Falchi, Jürgen Fischer, Andrea Giacomelli, Francesco Giubbilini, Marty Haaima, Claudia Hesse, Georg Heygster, Franz Hölker, Richard Inger, Linsey J. Jensen, Helga U. Kuechly, John Kuehn, Phil Langill, Dorien E. Lolkema, Matthew Nagy, Miguel Nievas, Nobuaki Ochi, Emil Popow, Thomas Posch, Johannes Puschnig, Thomas Ruhtz, Wim Schmidt, Robert Schwarz, Axel Schwope, Henk Spoelstra, Anthony Tekatch, Mark Trueblood, Constance E. Walker, Michael Weber, Douglas L. Welch, Jaime Zamorano, Kevin J. Gaston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 60% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 40% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,423,683
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#93,219
of 123,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,941
of 264,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,400
of 1,929 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,929 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.