↓ Skip to main content

A novel cardiac output response to stress test developed to improve diagnosis and monitoring of heart failure in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in ESC Heart Failure, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 266)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel cardiac output response to stress test developed to improve diagnosis and monitoring of heart failure in primary care
Published in
ESC Heart Failure, June 2018
DOI 10.1002/ehf2.12302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J. Charman, Nduka C. Okwose, Renae J. Stefanetti, Kristian Bailey, Jane Skinner, Arsen Ristic, Petar M. Seferovic, Mike Scott, Stephen Turley, Ahmet Fuat, Jonathan Mant, Richard F.D. Hobbs, Guy A. MacGowan, Djordje G. Jakovljevic

Abstract

Primary care physicians lack access to an objective cardiac function test. This study for the first time describes a novel cardiac output response to stress (CORS) test developed to improve diagnosis and monitoring of heart failure in primary care and investigates its reproducibility. Prospective observational study recruited 32 consecutive primary care patients (age, 63 ± 9 years; female, n = 18). Cardiac output was measured continuously using the bioreactance method in supine and standing positions and during two 3 min stages of a step-exercise protocol (10 and 15 steps per minute) using a 15 cm height bench. The CORS test was performed on two occasions, i.e. Test 1 and Test 2. There was no significant difference between repeated measures of cardiac output and stroke volume at supine standing and Stage 1 and Stage 2 step exercises (all P > 0.3). There was a significant positive relationship between Test 1 and Test 2 cardiac outputs (r = 0.92, P = 0.01 with coefficient of variation of 7.1%). The mean difference in cardiac output (with upper and lower limits of agreement) between Test 1 and Test 2 was 0.1 (-1.9 to 2.1) L/min, combining supine, standing, and step-exercise data. The CORS, as a novel test for objective evaluation of cardiac function, demonstrates acceptable reproducibility and can potentially be implemented in primary care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Unspecified 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Other 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#732,277
of 13,482,696 outputs
Outputs from ESC Heart Failure
#33
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,911
of 267,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ESC Heart Failure
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,482,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.