↓ Skip to main content

Public health implications of overscreening for carotid artery stenosis, prediabetes, and thyroid cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
85 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Public health implications of overscreening for carotid artery stenosis, prediabetes, and thyroid cancer
Published in
Public Health Reviews, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40985-018-0095-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bich-May Nguyen, Kenneth W. Lin, Ranit Mishori

Abstract

Overscreening occurs when people without symptoms undergo tests for diseases and the results will not improve their health. In this commentary, we examine three examples of how campaigns to screen and treat specific vascular, metabolic, and oncologic diseases in asymptomatic individuals have produced substantial overdiagnosis and may well have contributed to more harm than good. These conditions were chosen because they may not be as well known as other cases such as screening for breast or prostate cancer. Screening for carotid artery stenosis can be a lucrative business using portable equipment and mobile vans. While this fatty buildup of plaque in the arteries of the neck is one risk factor for ischemic stroke, current evidence does not suggest that performing carotid dopplers to screen for CAS reduces the incidence of stroke or provide long-term benefits. After a positive screening, the follow-up procedures can lead to heart attacks, bleeding, strokes, and even death. Similarly, many organizations have launched campaigns for "prediabetes awareness." Screening for prediabetes with a blood sugar test does not decrease mortality or cardiovascular events. Identifying people with prediabetes could lead to psychological stress and starting medication that may have significant side effects. Finally, palpating people's necks or examining them with ultrasounds for thyroid cancer is common in many countries but ineffective in reducing mortality. Deadly forms of thyroid cancer are rare, and the overall 5-year survival rate is excellent. Interventions from treatment for more prevalent, less aggressive forms of thyroid cancer can lead to surgical complications, radiation side effects, or require lifelong thyroid replacement therapy. Screening for carotid artery stenosis, prediabetes, and thyroid cancer in an asymptomatic population can result in unnecessary, harmful, and costly care. Systemic challenges to lowering overscreening include lack of clinician awareness, examination of conflicts of interests, perverse financial incentives, and communication with the general public.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#606,067
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#17
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,065
of 341,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.