↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Applying the lessons of maternal mortality reduction to global emergency health

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying the lessons of maternal mortality reduction to global emergency health
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, March 2015
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.146571
Pubmed ID
26240463
Authors

Emilie J Calvello, Alexander P Skog, Andrea G Tenner, Lee A Wallis

Abstract

Over the last few decades, maternal health has been a major focus of the international community and this has resulted in a substantial decrease in maternal mortality globally. Although, compared with maternal illness, medical and surgical emergencies account for far more morbidity and mortality, there has been less focus on global efforts to improve comprehensive emergency systems. The thoughtful and specific application of the concepts used in the effort to decrease maternal mortality could lead to major improvements in global emergency health services. The so-called three-delay model that was developed for maternal mortality can be adapted to emergency service delivery. Adaptation of evaluation frameworks to include emergency sentinel conditions could allow effective monitoring of emergency facilities and further policy development. Future global emergency health efforts may benefit from incorporating strategies for the planning and evaluation of high-impact interventions.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 417 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 123 29%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Student > Postgraduate 39 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Researcher 33 8%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 78 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 89 21%
Social Sciences 38 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 93 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,684,258
of 21,446,675 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#941
of 4,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,558
of 253,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,446,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.